An essay on the existence or lack of god
There can be no such thing as duty in isolation.
Persuasive essay on the existence of god
Does God exist? Although many people ask how God could create a world involving so much evil, by far most of the suffering in the world is due to man's own inhumanity to man. Both legal and moral laws may be understood as holding prima facie, so that in some situations a person must violate one law in order to obey a more important one. Richard Wurmbrand reports, The cruelty of atheism is hard to believe when man has no faith in the reward of good or the punishment of evil. The fact is that we do apprehend objective values, and we all know it. But this is both uncharitable and inaccurate. Garcia, R. George Mavrodes, for instance, constructs a theoretical moral argument by contending that it would be extremely odd that we would have moral obligations the fulfillment of which results in a net loss to the agent. However, this is far from obviously true; in fact, if theism is true it is clearly false.
The argument that the existence of God can be known to all, even prior to exposure to any divine revelation, predates Christianity. Moral Arguments as Pragmatic Arguments Pragmatic arguments in support of theistic belief can either be predicated on prudence or on morality. Actions like rape, torture, child abuse, and brutality are not just socially unacceptable behavior—they are moral abominations.
They have offered cosmological arguments for the nonexistence of God on the basis of considerations from physics, astronomy, and subatomic theory.
Dennett, D. Jung : "I do not believe, I know. We cannot prove that God exists, merely by considering the word God, for that strategy work, we would have to presume to know God 's essence.
Short essay on existence of god
Liu, X. Finally, on the theistic hypothesis God holds all persons morally accountable for their actions. We feel, too, as if the appeal of religion to us were made to our own active good-will, as if evidence might be forever withheld from us unless we met the hypothesis half-way. According to the principle of indifference, when we don't have any evidence favoring any of a set of alternatives over the others, we should count each alternative equally likely. It's just an accident that the universe is life-permitting, and we're the lucky beneficiaries. Is it possible that this may have happened in many instances? So there appear to be a number of precedents and epistemic principles at work in our belief structures that provide room for inductive atheism. Mavrodes, George, The wide positive atheist denies that God exists, and also denies that Zeus, Gefjun, Thor, Sobek, Bakunawa and others exist. It is not clear how it could be reasonable to believe in such a thing, and it is even more doubtful that it is epistemically unjustified or irresponsible to deny that such a thing is exists. That is, many people have carefully considered the evidence available to them, and have actively sought out more in order to determine what is reasonable concerning God. This argument contends that an intelligent designer of the world does exist, and structured the universe so that most natural things fit together for a clear purpose.
He is by nature loving, generous, just, faithful, kind, and so forth. Non-cognitivists have argued that many believers are confused when their speech acts and behavior slips from being non-cognitive to something resembling cognitive assertions about God.
Denonn, New York: Touchstone,p. You hear the command given: "Ready! The Big Bang would not have been the route God would have chosen to this world as a result. Following Theodore Drange's terminology, I shall refer to this objection as the "Noncognitivity Objection".
based on 108 review